CIVICSBY SAILORBOB
CIVICS / THE PUBLIC RECORD

California SB 1192 — Domestic violence: Reclaim Act.

California, 20252026. SB 1192: Domestic violence: Reclaim Act.

SB 119220252026 sessionSenate

Plural source record ↗

Official legislative source ↗

Latest action

September 30, 2026 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 847, Statutes of 2026.

Summary

Existing law permits a court, on its own motion or the motion of any party, to enter a prefiling order prohibiting a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in propria persona without first obtaining leave of the presiding judge of the court where the litigation is proposed to be filed. Existing law permits a presiding judge or a presiding justice to allow a vexatious litigant's filing only under specified circumstances and permits the presiding judge to condition the filing upon the furnishing of security. Existing law defines a vexatious litigant for these purposes to include, among other things, a person who, after being restrained by a domestic violence restraining order, and while that order is still in place, commenced, prosecuted, or maintained one or more litigations against a person protected by the restraining order. Existing law authorizes a person protected by a restraining order issued after a hearing pursuant to the above-described provisions to file a petition, without fee, to have the person who is the subject of that order declared a vexatious litigant if, while the restraining order is still in place, they commence, prosecute, or maintain litigation against the person protected by the restraining order in an action that is determined to be meritless and caused the person protected by the order to be harassed or intimidated. Existing law authorizes a court to issue, after notice and a hearing, orders enjoining a party from engaging in specified behavior, including contacting, attacking, or threatening another party. This bill would, in any litigation pending in any court of this state, create a process for a victim of domestic violence, as defined, that is a party to the action to seek protection from abusive litigation by a person who abused them by requesting a prefiling order at any time until final judgment is entered in the litigation. The bill would require a court to grant a request for a prefiling order if the victim demonstrates, after notice and a hearing and by a preponderance of the evidence, that the party against whom the order is sought is a perpetrator, as defined, and that the litigation filed or the discovery requested by the perpetrator was frivolous or abusive. The bill would require a person subject to a prefiling order to obtain permission from the court to file any litigation or conduct discovery against the victim, as specified. The bill would also establish a process by which a party subject to a prefiling order may apply to have the order vacated. If a party subject to a prefiling order violates that order, the bill would make them subject to sanctions, attorney's fees, and costs, as specified. The bill would enumerate a number of rights of victims of domestic violence that may be enforced, but which do not create a cause of action against the state or local government entities. This bill would provide that the victim would not be charged filing fees for any filings related to seeking a prefiling order and that any party may file documents electronically without charge and that any party, attorney, support person, or witness may appear remotely in these hearings without charge. This bill would require the clerk of the court to provide the Judicial Council with a copy of any prefiling orders issued. The bill would require the Judicial Council to maintain records of all prefiling orders issued and, on or before January 1, 2028, to create and modify court forms to implement the bill, as specified.

Sponsors

Bill text

SB1192 Read version ↗

02/19/26 - Introduced Read version ↗

04/06/26 - Amended Senate Read version ↗

04/23/26 - Amended Senate Read version ↗

06/17/26 - Amended Assembly Read version ↗

06/25/26 - Amended Assembly Read version ↗

08/24/26 - Enrolled Read version ↗

09/30/26 - Chaptered Read version ↗

Recorded votes

Special Consent

May 22, 2026 · Senate · pass

yes: 33 · no: 0 · other: 7

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (40)
MemberVote
Allenother
Nielloother
Sternother
Alvarado-Gilother
Padillaother
Hurtadoother
Beckerother
Graysonyes
Menjivaryes
Ochoa Boghyes
Wahabyes
Lairdyes
McGuireyes
Richardsonyes
Choiyes
Caballeroyes
Smallwood-Cuevasyes
Groveyes
Seyartoyes
Limónyes
Dahleyes
Jonesyes
Ashbyyes
Reyesyes
Valladaresyes
Arreguínyes
Archuletayes
Blakespearyes
Umbergyes
Cervantesyes
Wieneryes
Cabaldonyes
Gonzalezyes
Stricklandyes
Weber Piersonyes
Pérezyes
McNerneyyes
Corteseyes
Durazoyes
Rubioyes

Do pass.

August 13, 2026 · Assembly · pass

yes: 15 · no: 0 · other: 0

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (15)
MemberVote
Pachecoyes
Hooveryes
Mark Gonzálezyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
Pellerinyes
Tangipayes
Calderonyes
Wicksyes
Fongyes
Solacheyes
Arambulayes
Dixonyes
Tayes
Krellyes
Calozayes

SB 1192 Rubio Senate Third Reading By Stefani

August 19, 2026 · Assembly · pass

yes: 78 · no: 0 · other: 1

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (79)
MemberVote
Blanca Rubioother
Aguiar-Curryyes
Petrie-Norrisyes
Gipsonyes
Carrilloyes
Bryanyes
Castilloyes
Schultzyes
Soriayes
Harabedianyes
Alanisyes
Jeff Gonzalezyes
Hartyes
Elhawaryyes
Wilsonyes
Muratsuchiyes
Tayes
Sanchezyes
Dixonyes
Papanyes
Macedoyes
Ramosyes
Solacheyes
Wallisyes
Stefaniyes
McKinnoryes
Ahrensyes
Chenyes
Boerneryes
Nguyenyes
Lowenthalyes
Calozayes
Schiavoyes
Alvarezyes
Johnsonyes
Tangipayes
Rogersyes
Ortegayes
Gabrielyes
Michelle Rodriguezyes
Pattersonyes
Sharp-Collinsyes
Pellerinyes
Krellyes
Wardyes
Bennettyes
Pachecoyes
Haneyyes
Bontayes
Bainsyes
Rivasyes
Jacksonyes
Hooveryes
Lackeyyes
Kalrayes
Calderonyes
Wicksyes
DeMaioyes
Ávila Faríasyes
Quirk-Silvayes
Bauer-Kahanyes
Daviesyes
Irwinyes
Connollyyes
Arambulayes
Florayes
Valenciayes
Zburyes
Patelyes
Ellisyes
Garciayes
Ransomyes
Addisyes
Celeste Rodriguezyes
Leeyes
Bermanyes
Hadwickyes
Fongyes
Mark Gonzálezyes

Unfinished Business SB1192 Rubio et al. Concurrence

August 20, 2026 · Senate · pass

yes: 30 · no: 0 · other: 10

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (40)
MemberVote
Pérezother
Padillaother
Ochoa Boghother
Reyesother
Smallwood-Cuevasother
Wahabother
Wienerother
Beckerother
Caballeroother
Alvarado-Gilother
Groveyes
Graysonyes
McGuireyes
Jonesyes
Valladaresyes
Arreguínyes
Gonzalezyes
Cervantesyes
Choiyes
Sternyes
Corteseyes
McNerneyyes
Umbergyes
Durazoyes
Weber Piersonyes
Cabaldonyes
Nielloyes
Menjivaryes
Ashbyyes
Archuletayes
Stricklandyes
Dahleyes
Blakespearyes
Richardsonyes
Limónyes
Seyartoyes
Lairdyes
Allenyes
Rubioyes
Hurtadoyes

Do pass as amended, and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar

June 23, 2026 · Assembly · pass

yes: 12 · no: 0 · other: 0

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (12)
MemberVote
Macedoyes
Bryanyes
Sanchezyes
Harabedianyes
Papanyes
Pachecoyes
Connollyyes
Bauer-Kahanyes
Kalrayes
Zburyes
Dixonyes
Stefaniyes

Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

April 21, 2026 · Senate · pass

yes: 13 · no: 0 · other: 0

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (13)
MemberVote
Valladaresyes
Nielloyes
Wieneryes
Wahabyes
Sternyes
Allenyes
Caballeroyes
Umbergyes
Weber Piersonyes
Lairdyes
Durazoyes
Ashbyyes
Reyesyes

Placed on suspense file

May 11, 2026 · Senate · pass

yes: 7 · no: 0 · other: 0

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (7)
MemberVote
Wahabyes
Seyartoyes
Graysonyes
Cervantesyes
Richardsonyes
Dahleyes
Cabaldonyes

Do pass

May 14, 2026 · Senate · pass

yes: 7 · no: 0 · other: 0

Official vote source ↗
Individual member positions (7)
MemberVote
Graysonyes
Richardsonyes
Dahleyes
Cabaldonyes
Wahabyes
Seyartoyes
Cervantesyes

Legislative history

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 847, Statutes of 2026.
  2. Approved by the Governor.
  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 0. Page 5576.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6265.) Ordered to the Senate.
  7. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  8. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 13).
  9. Assembly Rule 63 suspended.
  10. August 5 set for first hearing. Placed on suspense file.
  11. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  12. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 23).
  13. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  14. June 16 hearing postponed by committee.
  15. Referred to Com. on JUD.
  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 4420.) Ordered to the Assembly.
  18. Ordered to special consent calendar.
  19. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
  20. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4268.) (May 14).
  21. Set for hearing May 14.
  22. May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
  23. Set for hearing May 11.
  24. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
  25. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 3979.) (April 21).
  26. Set for hearing April 21.
  27. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
  28. Referred to Com. on JUD.
  29. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 22.
  30. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

State and local records are supplied by Plural Open (Open States), with links to original legislative sources. Coverage and update times vary. A vote passing one chamber does not mean a bill became law. State source changes are checked hourly; some detailed records may appear later because of source limits.